Note: While the content of this site is accessible to any browser or internet device, this site was designed for a web standards compliant browser such as: Mozilla, Microsoft Internet Explorer (Windows version 6+, Netscape 7, Safari , Konqueror, and Galeon.
If your web browser is not web standards compliant then this site won't appear as designed.

Modified:
Nov 7, 2004
West Nile Virus

West Nile Virus
Bibliography of Scientific Literature (O-Q)

  • Office International des Epizooties. 1999. West Nile Fever in Israel in Geese (corrected data). Disease Information 12:150-151.
  • Okeson D., S. Llizo, C. Miller, A. Glaser. 2002. Antibody Response of Four Bird Species After Vaccination with a Killed WNV Vaccine. Paper presented at 51st Annual Meeting of the Wildlife Disease Association. 28 July-1 August, 2002.
  • Peiris, J.S.M. and F.P. Amerasinghe. 1994. West Nile fever. Pages 139-148 in G. Beran, ed., Handbook of Zoonoses, Section B: Viral, 2nd Ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
  • Perich, M.J., C. Wells, W. Bertsch and K.E. Tredway. 1995. Isolation of the Insecticidal Components of Tagetes minuta (Compositae) against Mosquito Larvae and Adults. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 11(3):307-310.
  • Petersen, Lyle R., and Anthony Marfin. 2002. West Nile Virus: A Primer for the Clinician. Annals of Internal Medicine. 137(3): 173-179. [pdf]

    Abstract: This paper provides the clinician with an understanding of the epidemiologic and biological characteristics of West Nile virus in North America, as well as useful information on the diagnosis, reporting, and management of patients with suspected West Nile virus infection and on advising patients about prevention. Information was gathered from the medical literature and from national surveillance data through May 2002. Since the identification of West Nile virus in New York City in 1999, enzootic activity has been documented in 27 states and the District of Columbia. Continued geographic expansion is likely. Overall, one in 150 infections results in severe neurologic illness. Advanced age is by far the most important risk factor for neurologic disease and, once disease develops, for worse clinical outcome. Surveillance has identified 149 persons with West Nile virus?related illness in 10 states. Encephalitis is more commonly reported than meningitis, and concomitant muscle weakness and flaccid paralysis may provide a clinical clue to the presence of West Nile virus infection. Peak incidence occurs in late summer, although onset has occurred from July through December. Immunoglobulin M antibody testing of serum specimens and cerebrospinal fluid is the most efficient method of diagnosis, although cross-reactions are possible in patients recently vaccinated against or recently infected with related flaviviruses. Testing can be arranged through local, state, or provincial (in Canada) health departments. Prevention rests on elimination of mosquito breeding sites; judicious use of pesticides; and avoidance of mosquito bites, including mosquito repellent use.

  • Petersen, Lyle R., and John T. Roehrig. 2001. West Nile Virus: A Reemerging Global Pathogen. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(4). http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol7no4/petersen.htm

    Excerpt: The recognition of West Nile (WN) virus in the Western Hemisphere in the summer of 1999 marked the first introduction in recent history of an Old World flavivirus into the New World. The United States is not alone, however, in reporting new or heightened activity in humans and other animals, and incursions of flaviviruses into new areas are likely to continue through increasing global commerce and travel. Similar expansion of other flaviviruses has been documented. Dengue viruses, perhaps the most important human flaviviral pathogens,, have spread from roots in Asia to all tropical regions. Japanese encephailitis (JE) virus has recently encroached on the northern shores of Australia an may soon become endemic in that continent. This issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases focuses on current understanding of the biology, ecology, and epidemiology of WNV.

    Authors are with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado.

  • Peyton, E.L., Scott R. Campbell, Thomas M. Candeletti, Michael Romanowski and Wayne J Crans. 1999. Aedes (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus (Theobald), a New Introduction into the United States.Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 15(2):238-241.

    Abstract: Aedes (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus is recorded for the 1st time in the United States. Four adult females were collected in light traps at 2 sites in New York and one site in New Jersey during the months of August and September 1998. Notes on bionomics are provided. Illustrations of the adult female, male, and larva are included.

  • Platonov, A.E., 2001. West Nile Encephalitis in Russia 1999-2001. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 951(1):102. http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/full/951/1/102

    Abstract: In 1963-1993, several strains of West Nile virus (WNV) were isolated from ticks, birds, and mosquitoes in the southern area of European Russia and western Siberia. In the same regions, anti-WNV antibody was found in 0.4-8% of healthy adult donors. Sporadic human clinical cases were observed in the delta of the Volga River. In spite of this, WNV infection was not considered by the health authorities as a potentially emerging infection, and the large WNV outbreak in southern Russia, started in late July 1999, was not recognized in a timely fashion. First evidence suggesting a WNV etiology of the outbreak was obtained by IgM ELISA on September 9. Two weeks later, the specific WNV RT-PCR was developed and WNV disease was confirmed in all 14 nonsurvivors from whom brain tissue samples were available. Retrospective studies of serum samples by IgM ELISA indicated WNV etiology in 326 of 463 survivors with aseptic meningitis or encephalitis. Moreover, 35 of 56 patients who contracted aseptic meningitis in 1998 had a high titer of WNV IgG antibody, so the WNV infection seems to have been introduced into the Volgograd region before 1999. A complete sequence (AF317203) of WN viral RNA, isolated from the brain of one Volgograd fatality, and partial sequences of an envelope E gene from other nonsurvivors showed that the Volgograd isolate had the greatest homology (99.6%) with WN-Romania-1996 mosquito strain RO97-50.

  • Platonov, Alexnder E., German A. Shipulin, Olga Yu. Shipulina, Elena N. Tyutyunnik, Tatyana I. Frolochkina, Robert S. Lanciotti, Svetlana Yazyshina, Olga V. Platonova, Igor L. Obukhov, Alexander N. Zhukov, Yury Ya. Vengerov, and Valenin I. Pokrovskii. 2001. Outbreak of West Nile Virus Infection, Volgograd Region, Russia, 1999. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(1 January-February 2001). http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol7no1/platanov.htm.

    Abstract: From July 25 to October 1, 1999, 826 patients were admitted to Volgograd Region, Russia, hospitals with acute aseptic meningoencephalitis, meningitis, or fever consistent with arboviral infection. Of 84 cases of meningoencephalitis, 40 were fatal. Fourteen brain specimens were positive in reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assays, confirming the presence of West Nile/Kunjin virus.

    Conclusions: ...Moreover, the last three large outbreaks were caused by genetically similar strains (WN-Romania-1996, WN-New York-1999, WN-Volgograd-1999), indicating the wide circulation and emergence of potentially epidemic strains of WN virus. All three cities, Bucharest, New York, and Volgograd, are located near large bodies of water and on bird migration pathways and all had unusually dry summers the year of the outbreak. Some clinical characteristics of the recent WN virus epidemics were unexpected, such as the high rate of neurologic disorders and death. These unusual characteristics may be due to the expansion of new pathogenic WN virus strain(s) or to the peculiarities of the human host response.

    Authors are with the Central Institute of Epidemiology, Moscow, Russia; Moscow State University for Medicine and Dentistry, Russia; Ministry of Public Health, Moscow, Russia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA; Russian State Institute for Control of Veterinary Products, Moscow, Russia; Center of Sanitary and Epidemic Control for Volgograd Region, Volgograd, Russia.

  • Pogodina, V.V., M.P. Frolova, G.V. Malenko, et al. 1983. Study on West Nile Virus Persistence in Monkeys.Arch. Virology 75:71. 
  • Pro-MED Mail (global PROgram for Monitoring Emerging Diseases ) is a program of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (ISID). West Nile Virus is just one of the diseases covered. Subscription information and archives are on the web: http://www.promedmail.org.

    Overview: The ProMED-mail electronic outbreak reporting system was inaugurated on the Internet in August 1994 to monitor emerging infectious diseases globally. It is the only outbreak rapid reporting system open to all sources and free of political restraints. All reports are screened by expert Moderators before posting. A central goal of ProMED is to establish a direct partnership among scientists and doctors in all parts of the world, by making it possible for all to share information and discuss emerging disease concerns on a timely basis. ProMED-mail welcomes the participation of all interested colleagues, students and interested people outside the health and biomedical professions. There is no charge for subscribing.

    ProMED-mail now reaches almost 20,000 direct subscribers in over 160 countries. Five years after its founding by the Federation of American Scientists, with the technical assistance of SatelLife, ProMED-mail became a program of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (ISID), a non-profit professional organization with headquarters in Boston and members around the world. ISID and ProMED-mail are supported by grants and contributions. For more information about ISID, see http://www.isid.org.

  • Qui, Hongchun, H. Won Jun, and John W. McCall. 1997. Pharmacokinetics, Formulation, and Safety of Insect Repellent N,N-Diethyl-3-Methylbenzamide (DEET): A Review. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 14(1):12-27.

    Abstract: This review is intended to provide the reader with an overview of the all-purpose topical insect repellent, N,N-diethyl-s-methylbenxamide (DEET), with emphasis on its pharmacokinetics, formulation, and safety aspects. DEET is effective against a variety of mosquitoes, flies, fleas, and ticks, and its protection efficacy depends on factors such as type of formulation, application pattern, physical activity of the user, environment, and species and feeding behavior of the insects. It offers an inexpensive and practical means of preventing the attachment of biting insects and, more importantly, the transmission of vector-borne diseases. In both humans and animals, DEET skin penetration and biodistribution are rapid and extensive, and metabolism and elimination appear to be complete. As evidenced by over 4 decades of human experience and rigorous animal testing, DEET is generally safe for topical use if applied as recommended, although it has occasionally been related to effects such as toxic encephalopathy, seizure, acute manic psychosis, cardiovascular toxicity, and dermatitis, along with a few cases of death due to extensive skin absorption. N,N-diethyl-s-methylbenxamide may compete in metabolism with and alter the biodistribution properties of other compounds to which a subject is simultaneously exposed, resulting in an added risk of side effects. The appropriate use of formulation techniques and new formulations not only offers a way to extend the duration of protection, but also reduces DEET skin penetration. In addition to extended repellency, minimal skin penetration of DEET should be an important consideration in the evaluation of a DEET formulation during new product development.

[Previous Page]   [Next Page]